Are People The Biggest Impediment to Customer Service?
Categories: Corporate Culture | Customer Service | Competitive Advantage
Posted by
Paul Orfalea
at
4:29 PM
4
comments
A curmudgeonly colleague of mine claims that he prefers automatic teller machines to human bank tellers because, "the machine knows me better, and it always says, ‘thank you.'"
He may be on to something. Online retailers Overstock.com, Zappos.com, and Amazon.com came in 2nd, 3rd, and 4th in the 2009 NRF Foundation/American Express Customers' Choice survey, right behind 1st place winner L.L. Bean, the catalog-retailing giant. Television shopping channel QVC came in fifth, which means that none of the top five retailers in this customer service survey is known for face-to-face service.
Brick-and-mortar retailers Nordstrom and Kohl's tied for tenth place. These companies seem to maintain a culture of customer service in shops dispersed throughout hundreds of malls, but in many other stores, it seems as if the salespeople often know less about their products and services than their customers do, and nothing at all about the customers themselves.
Two differences leap to mind when I consider the survey rankings.
First, the online and catalog retailers know how to use customer information. For years, consumers ridiculed Radio Shack, which continuously badgered them for information but never seemed to use it for any specific purpose. Amazon, on the other hand, quickly seems to know its customers better than their own spouses do.
When you walk into a department store, your buying history does not change the layout of the store to accommodate you, but when you log onto Amazon, it does. Customers may choose to refine the system's knowledge by rating purchases, but even when they don't, the personalization of the shopping experience is surprisingly accurate.
Ironically, the automated shopping experience often seems more personal than the in-person store visit. While mall clerks robotically attempt to upsell whatever product their manager overstocked, online retailers suggest additional products and services based on your known preferences. Upselling has long been a retail profit enhancement tactic - online retailers turn it into a customer benefit.
Another significant difference is that unlike brick-and-mortar retailers, catalog and online companies have the option to hire and train a small core of centrally located customer service representatives. As a result, the company's leadership exerts direct influence on coworker development and organizational culture.
Physical retail chains face a tougher challenge. A far-flung empire of buildings, managers, and part-time coworkers presents numerous points of failure. As the survey notes, some physical retailers do a good job, but the world of shopping has changed, and it will be interesting to see whether in-person retailers will find a way to benefit from the customer service innovations of their online competitors.
Comments
Kai Stephan wrote on 04/09/10 12:03 PM
This survey really shows how the internet is having an impact on traditional retailing, not to mention every other aspect of life. Apart from the two aforementioned significant differences between online and brick-and-mortar retailers, I feel there are two other big differences that might have had an affect on the survey: convenience and near-infinite inventory.
First, online retailers are not only often more convenient for shopping-you can go to their store no matter where you physically are- but also in the delivery and return of the products. Take for example Zappos, who pays for the return shipping. If I don’t like the shoes I bought, all I have to do is place the shoes back in the box they came in, attach the return shipping sticker that was in the box, and drop it off at any shipping center or mailbox. Compare that to a return in the brick-and-mortar store, where you have to often find your receipt (maybe between the couch cushions?), drive to the specific store, wait in line at the customer service desk, and sometimes deal with questions regarding as to why it is being returned. Now the brick-and-mortar store may have great customer service and return policies, but there is still the hassle involved of doing work to return the product.
Second is inventory. With the near-zero marginal costs of adding an addition page to one’s website for a new product, the amount of “inventory” of an online retailer can be nearly limitless. I quote inventory because although online retailers often have warehouses where physical inventory is kept, products not sold as much can be drop shipped directly from the manufacturer. Thus, they stock these products, but don’t pay the inventory costs of owning a warehouse. Brick-and-mortar retailers are limited by the physical size of their store, thus limiting their selection of products to a finite amount. This can lead to customer dissatisfaction when he/she is looking for a particular item in a store and fails to find it.
It is without a doubt that as the world becomes progressively “flatter”, competition among like businesses escalates. The market place continues to trend in the consumer’s favor.
Colenn wrote on 04/14/10 5:28 PM
I think that the rankings bring up a question about causation versus correlation. Did people select the online retailers as their favorites because they actually prefer the online customer service, or because they correlate these companies with inexpensive products? I'm not sure if LL Bean or QVC offer competitive prices, but they do offer products that people living in isolated areas couldn't necessarily find in local stores. So, although online shopping and other virtual shopping offer great benefits, like convenience and knowledge of customers' preferences, people could favor them (maybe even subconsciously) because of their low prices.
Bob wrote on 04/27/10 5:56 PM
One of the reasons that Circuit City went belly up was that the kids in the stores didn't know much about their products and that they agressively tried to sell up-I quit going into their stores because no matter what I wanted, the saleskid tried to sell me something else, always more expensive. On the other hand, Mens' Warehouse does a great job of making the dorkiest of us feel like a fashion plate. Even though I always spend much more than anticipated at MW, I always feel like I was well-served. I may still be a dork, but I feel like a well-dressed one. MW trains their saleskids well, CC didn't.....



Ehrin Davis wrote on 04/05/10 3:26 PM
I would certainly agree that shopping online is a much easier and more enjoyable experience than going to a physical retailer. The trend of online and automated service is increasing at a huge rate, in part to the ease of NOT having to deal with a physical employee. Consumers will continue to benefit but the question is: how much will workers be hurt?
Work continues to follow the trend of being made efficient by being automated, leaving more people looking for jobs once they become replaced by a machine. There is evidence of this in the financial crisis and ensuing recession. Even with the economy showing signs of growth, the jobless rates are still very high. Or, in other words, companies can function and grow and major transactions can take place but without the need for many actual people carrying-out tasks. Automated computer-based services generally do the job much better than a human salesperson (or assembly line worker) but at what cost to the workers that are replaced?